General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScientists Discover Major Errors in Al Gore-Founded Climate Pollution Database
https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-discover-major-errors-in-al-gore-founded-climate-pollution-database/An analysis found that Climate TRACE may substantially underestimate city vehicle CO2 emissions, raising concerns about data accuracy in climate policy.
Not in a good way for the planet, unfortunately.
A new study from Northern Arizona University reports that the global greenhouse gas emissions database created by the Climate TRACE consortium, co-founded by former Vice President Al Gore, may be undercounting vehicle carbon dioxide emissions in cities by an average of 70%.
The findings, published in Environmental Research Letters, come as governments and cities increasingly rely on high-resolution emissions data to shape climate policy and track progress toward emissions goals.
Led by Kevin Gurney, a professor in NAU's School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems (SICCS), the study examined how Climate TRACE estimated emissions from cars and trucks and compared those figures against established transportation and fuel-use data. According to Gurney, the discrepancies -- combined with similar issues his team previously identified in power plant emissions estimates -- raise broader concerns about the reliability of rapidly emerging AI-driven climate monitoring systems.
"Given the importance of vehicle CO2 emissions in cities, we carefully examined the Climate TRACE data which relied on promising new artificial intelligence-based approaches," Gurney said. "When combined with our previous study on Climate TRACE power plant CO2 emissions, our results suggest that the Climate TRACE data significantly underestimate over half of U.S. fossil fuel-based CO2 emissions in cities."
. . .
hlthe2b
(114,735 posts)overestimate the issues and risks Gore has been preaching for years over climate change, when it is exactly the opposite. The error UNDERESTIMATES. I am having a cranky-headache day, so it is easy for me to overreact as such, but when so many people don't reach much past headlines, it concerns me.
Editors and writers of headlines on these articles--especially science, medicine, and legal articles need to be cognizant of that IMO.
At any rate, not good news, regardless.
Thanks for posting, still.
erronis
(24,582 posts)Funny how an unexpected headline grabs attention!
haele
(15,618 posts)If there's something that was missed in the database, that doesn't mean the entire premise is faulty and and we need to chuck it all and start over. Just means they found something new that needed to be considered.
ananda
(35,529 posts)We're screwed regardless.