Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

AllaN01Bear

(30,277 posts)

23. ding. this .

Reply to senseandsensibility (Original post)

Wed Jul 8, 2026, 09:00 PM

Wednesday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wednesdays

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Breaking from Gavin Newsom [View all] senseandsensibility Wednesday OP

We all love our Governor! skylucy Wednesday #1

Oh yes we do senseandsensibility Wednesday #3

K & R.................. Lovie777 Wednesday #2

here as well, Marc Elias DoBW Wednesday #4

He'd make a good president. calimary Wednesday #6

He's my favorite so far. llmart Wednesday #10

thats why i reelected him before. AllaN01Bear Wednesday #24

I will definitely give Newsom close consideration. ShazzieB 22 hrs ago #35

His best qualification azureblue 15 hrs ago #39

I'm surprised it wasn't all along! some_of_us_are_sane Wednesday #9

He's been at the vanguard of MAGA 2.0 resistance from Day 1. BannonsLiver Wednesday #5

Every state needs to do this IMMEDIATELY FakeNoose Wednesday #7

You're right. It should not be necessary. hamsterjill Wednesday #19

Kick Exp Wednesday #8

Purple states must take the same steps. oasis Wednesday #11

This would actually probably survive the supremacy clause too SSJVegeta Wednesday #12

Yes, because states are in charge of elections, not the feds. wnylib Wednesday #26

And it is explicitly stated in the constitution. A fact that matters to 5 whole justices so far. SSJVegeta Wednesday #31

LOL popsdenver 21 hrs ago #36

I'm skeptical. TomSlick Wednesday #13

Nope. Article I, Section 4. paleotn Wednesday #15

I don't read Article I, Section 4 that expansively. TomSlick Wednesday #17

Tenth Amendment. paleotn Wednesday #18

That's a better argument TomSlick Wednesday #20

You're retired JAG, in Arkansas, and you're Texas two step dancing MerryBlooms Wednesday #29

That's what old lawyers do. TomSlick 7 hrs ago #42

My father-in-law was a District Judge MerryBlooms 6 hrs ago #43

The legislation can be written so that a proper judicial warrant would be needed with reason to believe muriel_volestrangler 16 hrs ago #38

Post removed Post removed Wednesday #16

Federal agents are also armed and authorized to shoot someone threatening with a weapon. TomSlick Wednesday #21

depends who gets the drop on who dave99 Wednesday #25

Ridiculous and illegal senseandsensibility Wednesday #22

No, that's not how any of this works. MerryBlooms Wednesday #30

Democrats have to be proactive in these treacherous times dlk Wednesday #14

ding. this . AllaN01Bear Wednesday #23

Post removed Post removed Wednesday #27

I don't know who you're talking about senseandsensibility Wednesday #28

This is exactly what we need!! Proactive vs reactive!!! Pisces Wednesday #32

He thinks and operates from a broad perspective. Sogo Wednesday #33

THis is good, but completely misss the point Bluetus Yesterday #34

i totally misunderstood the headline orleans 21 hrs ago #37

Leading the way. Martin68 12 hrs ago #40

I believe there are now meds for ballot seizures. C Moon 10 hrs ago #41