Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(162,670 posts)
17. Statement from Disney, posted on the website of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
Wed Apr 27, 2022, 02:47 AM
Apr 2022

This is the Statement that Disney filed with municipal securities board.
https://emma.msrb.org/P21566885-P21210477-.pdf

STATEMENT RE SPECIAL LEGISLATIVE SESSION

On April 20, 2022 in a special legislative session called by Governor Ron DeSantis, the Florida Senate passed a bill (S 4C), providing for the dissolution, effective June 1, 2023, of any independent special district established by special act of the Florida legislature prior to the effective date of the current Florida Constitution, which was November 5, 1968. The Florida House of Representatives is expected to vote on an identical bill (HB 3C, and collectively with S 4C, the “Bill”) today which, if passed by the House, is expected to be signed into law by the Governor at the end of the special session on April 22, 2022. Reedy Creek Improvement District (“Reedy Creek” or the “District”) was established as a public corporation of the State by Chapter 67-764 Laws of Florida, effective May 12, 1967 (the “Reedy Creek Act”). Pursuant to the Bill Reedy Creek will be scheduled for dissolution on June 1, 2023. The Bill further provides that any special districts dissolved as a result of the Bill (including the District) may be reestablished on or after June 1, 2023 pursuant to the requirements and limitations of Florida’s Uniform Special District Accountability Act, which provides, among other things, that unless otherwise provided by law, the dissolution of a special district government shall transfer title to all of its property to the local general purpose government, which shall also assume all indebtedness of the preexisting
special district.

In the Reedy Creek Act the State of Florida has pledged to the holders of any bonds issued by the District:

(1) that it will not limit or alter the rights of the District (a) to own, acquire, construct, reconstruct, improve, maintain, operate or furnish the projects or to levy and collect the taxes, assessments, rentals, rates, fees, tolls, fares and other charges provided for in the Reedy Creek Act, and (b) to fulfill the terms of any agreement made with the holders of any bonds or other obligations of the District; and (2) that it will not in any way impair the rights or remedies of the holders, and that it will not modify in any way the exemption from taxation provided in the Reedy Creek Act, until all such bonds together with interest thereon, and all costs and expenses in connection with any act or proceeding by or on behalf of such holders, are fully met and discharged.

In light of the State of Florida’s pledge to the District’s bondholders, Reedy Creek expects to explore its options while continuing its present operations, including levying and collecting its ad valorem taxes and collecting its utility revenues, paying debt service on its ad valorem tax bonds and utility revenue bonds, complying with its bond covenants and operating and maintaining its properties.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The law is blatantly unconstitutional. The gov't cannot squelch free speech. Period. CurtEastPoint Apr 2022 #1
I agree ! steve2470 Apr 2022 #2
I read earlier that to officially do away with the special district status, it would require a vote In It to Win It Apr 2022 #13
Agreed. The government cannot revoke a privilege because of speech it disagrees with In It to Win It Apr 2022 #12
Perhaps the law will be repealed (more than likely) but then in an act of revenge, the state will... SWBTATTReg Apr 2022 #3
NO! Revenge of any type for protected speech is unconstitutional! tableturner Apr 2022 #9
June of 2023 zipplewrath Apr 2022 #4
Nothing will be done on a state level. Any pressure on Tallahassee will be from the counties. taxi Apr 2022 #5
It appears that many DU posters now favor mega corporations using veto power over state government MichMan Apr 2022 #6
No revenge for protected speech....THAT is the issue! tableturner Apr 2022 #11
I think that he will escape any justice and win reelection handily. Chainfire Apr 2022 #7
This is a wierd one tirebiter Apr 2022 #8
Florida has NO right to punish in any way for protected speech! tableturner Apr 2022 #10
I am literally astounded that Republicans would cheer such a move In It to Win It Apr 2022 #14
To answer the questions In It to Win It Apr 2022 #15
Disney tells investors state can't dissolve special district without paying debt LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2022 #16
Statement from Disney, posted on the website of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2022 #17
thanks for your research ! nt steve2470 Apr 2022 #18
Has there been any other words from the administration onethatcares Apr 2022 #19
Will this mouse roar? Loge23 Apr 2022 #20
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Florida»My fellow Floridians, let...»Reply #17