Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Drug Policy
Showing Original Post only (View all)U.S. Supreme Court: Federal Law Does Not Pre-empt State MMJ Law [View all]
http://www.thedailychronic.net/2011/7350/supreme-court-state-medical-marijuana-laws-not-preempted-by-federal-law/WASHINGTON, DC The U.S. Supreme Court refused to review a landmark decision today in which California state courts found that its medical marijuana law was not preempted by federal law. The state appellate court decision from November 28, 2007, ruled that it is not the job of the local police to enforce the federal drug laws.
The case, involving Felix Kha, a medical marijuana patient from Garden Grove, was the result of a wrongful seizure of medical marijuana by local police in June 2005. Medical marijuana advocates hailed todays decision as a huge victory in clarifying law enforcements obligation to uphold state law. Advocates assert that better adherence to state medical marijuana laws by local police will result in fewer needless arrests and seizures. In turn, this will allow for better implementation of medical marijuana laws not only in California, but in all states that have adopted such laws.
Its now settled that state law enforcement officers cannot arrest medical marijuana patients or seize their medicine simply because they prefer the contrary federal law, said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the medical marijuana advocacy organization that represented the defendant Felix Kha in a case that the City of Garden Grove appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Perhaps, in the future local government will think twice about expending significant time and resources to defy a law that is overwhelmingly supported by the people of our state.
The source of local law enforcements resistance to upholding state law is an outdated, harmful federal policy with regard to medical marijuana, said ASA spokesperson Kris Hermes. This should send a message to the federal government that its time to establish a compassionate policy more consistent with the 13 states that have adopted medical marijuana laws.
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The executive branch and Congress need to respond to the will of the American people
RainDog
May 2012
#4
i agree but not because a majority of people, that's a slippery slope I won't go near.
Lionessa
May 2012
#5
I agree - but the reason a majority want the law to change is because of the science
RainDog
May 2012
#6
I see this as a win for human rights, not because of the origin of the law. I'm encouraged by it.
freshwest
May 2012
#12
Misleading headline -- Actually, as stated in the story, "The U.S. Supreme Court REFUSED TO REVIEW
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2012
#18
Of course that's what that means. In contrast, it does not mean (as improperly implied by the
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2012
#23