Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William Seger

(11,562 posts)
2. Well, I prefer to put my faith in common sense, too, but...
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 11:04 AM
Jan 2014

... the logic of the conclusion here seems to be flawed, at least as it's stated in this article. Proving that people can "detect a change in surroundings, even if they cannot accurately describe it" is not surprising, but it doesn't really "rule out" being able to also detect things through "extrasensory" means. My common sense says that I shouldn't believe that's possible unless and until someone reliably demonstrates it under controlled conditions, but saying that this study proves non-existence is overstating the case.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Researchers dismiss sixth...»Reply #2