Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GreatGazoo

(4,776 posts)
22. Futures lock in a price right now
Thu Jun 4, 2026, 01:28 PM
Yesterday

All of the large companies which use lots of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, have traders on staff who buy and trade oil futures.

In a sense it is the oil companies who are selling short. eg they are selling December's oil right now so even if the price goes way up they are locked in and must deliver at $80. That is why UPS, AA, Pepsi, Amazon, etc. buy futures -- it lets them know what their costs are going to be. The airlines are a big one. You can buy a ticket right now for Thanksgiving travel so the airline needs to know what they will pay for fuel in November ($82) so that they can price their tickets.

Those stair step declines of about $2 per month in futures prices mean that in general the market sees more alternatives to Hormuz oil becoming available the further into the future you look. Part of that is that they know which pipelines can move oil to other delivery points such as the Red Sea and how much can be moved by rail. In general there has been an oversupply of oil ever since covid which drove prices down last year to about $57. They can't make money unless oil is above $60 so they usually start a war or sanctions or do whatever every time the price of oil goes below $60. Sure enough last year they attacked Iran and snatched Maduro. That pushed prices up not much until Feb 28. Now they have halted sanctions on Russian oil to increase supply to compensate for the Hormuz situation and keep oil under $100. Ideally they want oil between $65 and $80. Once it goes above $80 countries start replacing it with coal, solar, nuke, mass transit, work from home, etc. That can destroy demand in the long term so they don't want oil to stay high. It is big ugly game.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The shit is on the wing orangecrush Yesterday #1
The storage cushion is fudgy. bucolic_frolic Yesterday #2
President Bone Spurs had a plan to get out of Vietnam. Emile Yesterday #3
Daddy's not buying his way out of this one. dem4decades Yesterday #4
From another perspective cachukis Yesterday #5
there's definitely been some adaptation... but still a lot has been kept afloat by the reserves that are likely to run LymphocyteLover Yesterday #27
No question. One of my worries is the takeover of cachukis Yesterday #31
Absolutely. I totally agree on all those points. The stock market is particularly a mess IMO LymphocyteLover Yesterday #32
Have invested mostly in real estate over the last cachukis Yesterday #34
Why would " Diesel goes first"??? Melon Yesterday #6
800,000 to 1.2 million SamuelTheThird Yesterday #11
It's one country. Multiply across all oil producing Melon Yesterday #41
Yes, but the key is how long the strait stays closed and how quickly the reserves run out LymphocyteLover Yesterday #28
Diesel is often made from mideastern crude while gasoline is made from US crude JT45242 Yesterday #30
Not In The US, Though ProfessorGAC 15 hrs ago #45
Completely wrong. GreatGazoo Yesterday #7
lol@your link SamuelTheThird Yesterday #10
You ignored all the numbers to nitpick about semantics GreatGazoo Yesterday #15
Are America's strategic reserves at a 40 year low right before the summer season? SamuelTheThird Yesterday #19
Traders in Singapore, Beijing and Mumbai aren't duped by whatever Trump says GreatGazoo Yesterday #36
This message was self-deleted by its author LymphocyteLover Yesterday #29
Futures Are Not Delivery modrepub Yesterday #39
"futures price contracts probably isn't a good predictor of actual future prices" -- meaning spot prices, yes GreatGazoo Yesterday #42
Future Prices Are Not Necessarily modrepub 17 hrs ago #43
No. For anyone holding a March contract at $63 their price in March was $63 GreatGazoo 16 hrs ago #44
Appreciate your insight as I'm an admitted economic idiot. I can see where Exxon would be trying to "warn" Cheezoholic Yesterday #21
Futures lock in a price right now GreatGazoo Yesterday #22
Admittedly, Im no expert or even amateur...but SamuelTheThird Yesterday #35
Since oil is sold as futures there is more profit when buyers panic about the future GreatGazoo Yesterday #37
All hinging on a deal that isn't going to happen SamuelTheThird Yesterday #38
Last week Exxon Mobil warned that oil inventories will fall to record low levels in coming weeks LymphocyteLover Yesterday #33
Demand destruction WSHazel Yesterday #8
"one of the key reasons that Trump started this conflict was to increase energy prices"-- agree LymphocyteLover Yesterday #25
And it's all part of the plan... 2naSalit Yesterday #9
Excellent summation. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #12
I don't think the Strait of Hormuz never reopening is going to happen, but it will not reopen without a major shock ToxMarz Yesterday #13
Agree. Thanks for the link. LymphocyteLover Yesterday #24
Kick dalton99a Yesterday #14
MAGA does the full collapse kairos12 Yesterday #16
First the bastids want to grift off it, if they can. GreenWave Yesterday #17
But I thouight it would be open in two weeks. AverageOldGuy Yesterday #18
That's the point. Blue Full Moon Yesterday #20
Unbelievably awful LymphocyteLover Yesterday #23
It's happening now as we speak. marble falls Yesterday #26
Remember that the UAE left OPEC a few weeks ago WSHazel Yesterday #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Strait of Hormuz d...»Reply #22